Welcome to SDIN Forums Login | Register | Faq  

SDIN Forums   Sustainable Development Issues Network Search     Photos Forums Home

Search

01-11-2007, 1:04 PM admin Joined on 01-24-2005 Posts 10 "Kill coal" Extract from "Unified Green Field Theory," by Grist writer David Roberts, at TomPaine.com, January 11, 2006 Kill coal. Coal is the enemy of the human race. It is corrosive to the communities and ecosystems where it is mined. Coal-fired power plants spew particulates and mercury pollution in to the air, cutting short some 30,000 lives a year. Those power plants are also responsible for 40 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions; electric power generation is the single biggest source of global greenhouse gases. The industry funds deliberately deceptive propaganda campaigns about global warming. Coal barons like Massey Energy's Don Blankenship< /A>  openly purchase state government officials to fight off labor and environmental enforcement. So-called "clean coal " is an improvement, if it is coupled with carbon sequestration. But, as I've argued, the full cost of coal liquefaction and carbon sequestration will make coal power uncompetitive with, for example, wind. The quickest way to kill coal is by putting a steep price on carbon emissions, enforcing existing Clean Air Act provisions on particulate pollution, and passing a tougher federal mercury pollution law.    Report

01-24-2007, 10:25 PM Rob Wheeler Joined on 01-25-2007 Posts 3 Re: "Kill coal" I support most of the statements included above, however I don't think it is helpful to say such divisive things as "Coal is the enemy of the human race." Even if it is the case today. We can find better words to frame our argument. I also agree that we ought to call for a price to be placed on carbon emissions, that all governments enact and enforce strict provisions to limit particulate pollution, and pass strong mercury pollution laws. However we should call for specific means and mechanisms to ensure that all governments do follow through on these things. One means could be to suggest that these commitments must be included as a part of the Nation Strategies for Sustainability and the Frameworks on Sustainable Production and Consumption and a review process must be undertaken to ensure that they are indeed.    Report

02-05-2007, 7:06 PM saynotocoal Joined on 02-05-2007 Posts 1 Re: "Kill coal" I completely agree.  Coal needs to go.  There are 150 pulverized coal plants being planned in the U.S..  Even if they use carbon capture - there are still some emissions that will escape.  They still spew mercury, which has been linked to numerous neurological issues and the pollution of waterways - plus the plants are allowed to report their own emissions.  The mercury cap and trade rule is ludicrous - it is creating mercury hot-spots near coal fired plants.  I would love to see carbon capture be required - as it would most likely kill all coal plants except possibly IGCC.  It would also make the price point for wind power become competitive.  Has anyone heard of the Company Citizenre?  They are touting the ability to provide solar panels with no up-front cost to homeowners.  On their website they state that they can do this because they charge the homeowners for electricity used in lieu of the electric company charging for the power they provide.  They call it an equipment rental fee, and it is based on usage just like an electric utility provider, however - they take the rate you currently pay and never raise it for up to 25 years.  So it works kind of like Dish network only on a larger scale.  If it really works - it could really capture a lot of market and convert a lot of houses to solar - thus reducing the need for cheap energy sources like coal.  The website is www.jointhesolution.com/saynotocoal  Let me know what you think.  The business plan looks sound, as they are taking orders prior to manufacturing.  This is smart rather than taking venture capital and producing a ton of panels and using up all the startup cash.  Since there is no risk and you pay no money until the panels are put on, then it seems like a no-brainer.           Report

12-04-2008, 5:37 AM adonispayton Joined on 12-04-2008 Posts 2 Re: "Kill coal" Every one believes that coal is a dirty fuel to burn. When coal was burnt it releases smoke and that smoke will move into the environment and leads to acid rains. But now scientists have developed ways to capture the pollutants trapped in coal before the impurities can escape into the atmosphere. Today, we have technology that can filter out 99 percent of the tiny particles and remove more than 95 percent of the acid rain pollutants in coal. Here is a link that might be useful: http://www.lincenergy.us    Report

12-16-2008, 1:48 AM kennedy Joined on 12-16-2008 Posts 2 Clean coal Companies If there are more coal-fired power plants..then there is a chance to the expose of more smoke in to the air.That will leads the environmental damage. Most of the electricity comes from the Coal plants,but at the same time protect the environment is also a big challenge to the plant owners.The recently used Technology which is Environment friendly is:"Clean Coal Technology".This technology has the responsibility. Follow the link:http://www.lincenergy.us/    Report

12-22-2008, 5:13 AM PeterSon_12k Joined on 12-22-2008 Posts 2 Clean Coal Power Coal is dirtiest renewable energy which is producing the carbon emissions in to the environment,causes acid rains,pollution etc.So,clean the coal is becoming very challenge to the environmentalists.Provide the technologies to capture the carbon emissions and store them in to under ground.So,there is a technology which will give contribute the pollution free environment called "Clean Coal Technology". There are so many Coal-fired power plants that will provide the electricity .But there is a plan to produce coal with clean.But the cost of the coal will make coal power very competitive. Follow the Link:lincenergy.us/    Report

SDIN Forums » CSD 15 - Energy... » Clean coal » "Kill coal"

(please select) Forums Home |- Search Forums |- Active Topics |- Unanswered Posts User Options |- Sign In |- Create a New Account |- Forgot Password CSD 16/17 - Agriculture, Rural Development, Land and Africa |- NGO background paper for CSD 16 |- Agriculture |- Rural Development |- Land |- Desertification |- Drought |- Africa All Stakeholders |- Introduce yourself! |- Marrakech Process |- Evaluating CSD-15 |- NGO views and comments on CSD-13 |- Evaluating CSD-14 |- Sustainable Production and Consumption |- The function and future of SDIN |- The function and future of CSD |- Sustainability and the MDGs |- Fresh Water Policy CSD 15 - Energy, air, climate & industry |- A New Paradigm: NGO Policy Statement |- Defining "sustainable energy" |- Shifting energy subsidies |- Nuclear power |- Clean coal |- Biofuels |- Countries on the right track |- Improving the CSD-15 process |- Cooperation among Major Groups NGO & Major Group Caucuses |- SPAC Caucus Forum |- Sustainable Communities Caucus |- Fresh Water Caucus |- Peace Caucus Cross-cutting issues |- NGO participation at CSD |- Improving the CSD process